Research paper · Version 1.0
How to stop smoking weed
Why daily weed is hard to give up for people who are in control everywhere else, what the first month without it is really like, and what a staged 90-day method targets, day by day
Phalanx Labs
31 October 2026
phalanxlabs.io
Research paper
How to stop smoking weed
Why daily weed is hard to give up for people who are in control everywhere else, what the first month without it is really like, and what a staged 90-day method targets, day by day
Phalanx Labs
Behavior and performance engineering · Dubai, Bangalore, London
Abstract
To stop smoking weed for good, change what you smoke for, not just how hard you try. Daily weed becomes the way you end the day, fall asleep and handle stress, so stopping leaves those jobs undone. Most daily smokers who stop feel withdrawal: bad sleep, strange dreams, irritability, anxiety, low appetite and strong cravings. It usually starts in the first day or two, peaks in the first week and fades over two to three weeks. Sleep can take longer. The brain's cannabinoid receptors, which heavy use turns down, recover in about four weeks. People who stop for good fix their sleep and routine first, stop everything they smoke together on the same day, get rid of what they can, plan what they'll do about every trigger that's left, and keep support in place for the months when the risk of smoking again is highest.
This paper explains each part of that answer and the research behind it. It covers whether weed is addictive, why it's hard to stop when you're in control everywhere else, why you smoke every day, how long withdrawal lasts, why you can't sleep and why your dreams get so vivid, how long weed stays in your system, how long your brain takes to recover, whether your memory and motivation come back, whether a tolerance break or cutting down works, how to stop when the people around you still smoke, and what to do if you smoke again. Each section starts with a short, direct answer. The detail and the evidence follow.
For most people, stopping weed isn't medically dangerous in the way stopping heavy drinking can be. But if you use cannabis for a medical condition, also drink heavily every day, take sleeping or anxiety medication, or have had psychosis, talk to a doctor before you stop. Section 2 explains why.
The last part of the paper describes what the Behavior Control System, the 90-day method Phalanx Labs runs with every client, targets for someone stopping weed and on which days. Of the 290+ clients we have worked with across 12 countries over 7 years, 98.4% had already tried and failed to stop before they came to us. We report a 97% success rate, defined as the share of clients who ran the program and stayed off the habit through the program and the six months of aftercare that follow it, and we explain how it is tracked and what it cannot show. It comes from client follow-up, not from a controlled trial. The program is not therapy, clinical care or medical treatment, and it does not replace a doctor.
Keywords
- how to stop smoking weed
- quit weed
- cannabis withdrawal
- weed withdrawal timeline
- CB1 receptors
- THC elimination
- sleep after quitting weed
- vivid dreams
- cannabis potency
- tolerance break
- cannabis and tobacco
- trigger reactivity
- habit
- relapse prevention
- recovery identity
01
1. How do you stop smoking weed? The short answer
In brief
You stop smoking weed for good by changing what it does for you: how you end the day, fall asleep and handle stress, and the plan you have for the moments you want to smoke. Expect two to three hard weeks while your body adjusts. Trying harder in the moment is the approach that fails most often.
Most people who want to stop smoking weed have already tried. Of the 290+ clients we have worked with across 12 countries over 7 years, 98.4% had already tried and failed to stop before they came to us. For weed the attempts tend to look alike: a tolerance break that ends the day it was meant to, a rule about evenings only, a switch to edibles or vapes, a bag thrown out on a Sunday and bought again on Wednesday. The research shows how common it is for those attempts to break down. In a study of 82 people who had stayed off weed for at least two weeks during outpatient treatment, 71% smoked again within six months, and 71% of those who smoked again went back to heavier use1. In a set of laboratory studies with daily smokers who were not trying to stop, 49% smoked again on the very first day weed was available to them2.
The usual explanation for those failures is a lack of willpower. That explanation is wrong in a specific and useful way. Willpower, in the sense of deliberate control by the prefrontal cortex, is real, but it is the faculty most easily taken offline by the conditions in which most smoking happens: stress, tiredness, poor sleep and the presence of something that has been linked to smoking before3-5. Weed adds two problems of its own. The first is withdrawal. Daily smokers who stop usually feel worse for two to three weeks, with irritability, anxiety, low mood and broken sleep, and the easiest way to feel better is to smoke6, 7. The second is that weed usually does a job. It ends the working day, it helps people fall asleep, it takes the edge off stress. When it stops, the job is still there. So the decision to stop is made by a rested person in the morning and has to be carried out by a tired, edgy person at eleven at night who can't sleep. People are poor at predicting how different they will feel in that second state8.
Modern addiction research explains what is happening underneath. Koob and Volkow describe addiction as a cycle of three stages, each run by different brain systems: using and its reward, in which dopamine teaches the habit and turns it into routine; withdrawal and low mood, in which the reward system responds less and the brain's stress systems take a bigger role; and preoccupation, in which craving rises and the prefrontal cortex can't hold it back9. Weed has its own version of each stage. THC, the main active compound in cannabis, works on the brain's own cannabinoid system, which helps regulate stress, sleep, appetite and reward. Regular use turns that system's receptors down, which produces tolerance and withdrawal. It disrupts sleep. It becomes the way a day ends. And in much of the world it is now legal, sold on the high street and many times stronger than it was a generation ago, so the triggers for it are hard to avoid.
It is also far more common as a daily habit than most people realise. In the United States, survey data covering 1979 to 2022 show that the share of people who use cannabis daily or almost daily rose fifteenfold between 1992 and 2022. In 1992 there were ten times as many daily or near-daily drinkers as daily or near-daily cannabis users. In 2022, for the first time, there were more daily cannabis users than daily drinkers: 17.7 million against 14.7 million10. Daily use is the pattern that carries most of the risk, and it is the pattern this paper is mostly about.
Two specimens drawn as plant stems whose height is the number of users, compared between the 1992 and 2022 surveys. Daily or near-daily alcohol users in the United States went from 8.9 million to 14.7 million. Daily or near-daily cannabis users went from 0.9 million to 17.7 million, so that in 2022 more people used cannabis daily than drank daily. Between 1992 and 2022 the per-person rate of daily or near-daily cannabis use rose fifteenfold.
| Attempt | What it changes | What it leaves in place |
|---|---|---|
| Stopping on resolve, the morning after a heavy night | The decision, at the moment it feels easy | Bad sleep, stress, the evening it used to fill and the withdrawal that peaks a few days later. Relies on self-control when it is weakest. |
| A tolerance break | Tolerance, for a set number of days | An end date. The habit, the triggers and the reasons for smoking are all waiting on the day the break ends. |
| Rules: evenings only, weekends only, one joint | When and how much | Each permitted session keeps the receptors turned down and wakes up the learned urge, so the rule is applied by the person least able to keep it. |
| Switching to edibles, vapes or CBD-heavy strains | How the THC gets in | The same reward loop and the same evening routine, through a different product. The concentrates used in vapes averaged 55.7% THC in 201711. |
| Stopping weed but keeping tobacco or drink | One habit of a set | The other habits, which were used alongside it and now set it off. Daily weed smokers who also smoke cigarettes are far more likely to smoke weed again2. |
| Throwing out the stash and deleting the number | Easy access, for a day or two | Nothing else. Weed is easy to get again, and the reasons for wanting it are unchanged. |
The rest of this paper takes the questions people ask about stopping weed one at a time. Section 2 answers whether weed is addictive and whether it is safe to stop all at once. Sections 3 and 4 explain why weed is hard to stop: what it does to the reward, stress and habit systems, and why it ends up in every part of the day. Sections 5 to 9 cover what happens after you stop: withdrawal, sleep and dreams, how long THC stays in the body, how long the brain takes to recover, and whether memory and motivation come back. Sections 10 to 12 deal with tolerance breaks and cutting down, with stopping when the people around you still smoke, and with what to do if you smoke again. Section 13 sets out what the Behavior Control System targets for someone stopping weed, day by day, and Sections 14 and 15 report our results, the limits of this paper and when to see a doctor. Where the program is described, we say what each day targets and why. We do not publish how.
02
2. Is weed addictive, and is it safe to stop all at once?
Days 1 to 15, Brain chemistry restabilization
In brief
Yes, weed can be addictive. Most people who try it never become dependent, but about three in ten people who used it in the past year in a large US survey had a cannabis use disorder. For most people, stopping all at once is safe. Some people need a doctor first, and this section says who.
Weed can be addictive, and the risk rises with how often you use it and how strong it is. In a nationally representative US survey, 30.6% of people who had used cannabis in the past year met the criteria for a cannabis use disorder in 2012 to 2013. Over the decade before, the share of all adults who used cannabis more than doubled, and the share with a cannabis use disorder rose from 1.5% to 2.9%12. A review in Nature Reviews Disease Primers puts cannabis use disorder at about 10% of the 193 million people who use cannabis worldwide13. Over a lifetime the odds look lower, because most people who try weed never use it often: in the same national survey data, the cumulative probability that a cannabis user would ever become dependent was 8.9%, compared with 22.7% for alcohol and 67.5% for nicotine14. Those figures describe everyone who has ever tried it. For someone who already smokes every day, the relevant question is not whether weed can be addictive but how strong the habit has become, and the fact that you are reading this paper is usually the answer.
Two things raise the risk most: frequency and strength. In a survey of adults in the UK, frequent use of high-potency cannabis predicted more severe dependence, especially in young people, while use of lower-potency types did not15. A systematic review of 20 studies found that higher-potency cannabis was associated with a higher risk of cannabis use disorder and of psychosis16. Section 3 describes how much stronger cannabis has become.
Dependence also takes time to show itself, and it tends to resolve over years rather than months. Among people in the national survey who did become dependent on cannabis, half had done so about five years after they first used it. Remission is common in the long run: the lifetime probability of remission from cannabis dependence was 97.2%, but half of those cases took about six years from the start of dependence14, 17. Six years is a long time to lose to a habit that most people expect to stop on their own.
A ruler of years drawn like a growing vine. From first use, half of the people who became dependent on cannabis did so after about five years. From the start of dependence, half were in remission after about six years. The lifetime probability of becoming dependent after trying cannabis was 8.9%, and the lifetime probability of remission once dependent was 97.2%.
2.1Is it safe to stop all at once?
For most people, yes. Cannabis withdrawal is real and common, but it is mainly a syndrome of mood and behavior, of light to moderate intensity, and it can usually be handled without a hospital stay18. That is different from alcohol and from benzodiazepines, where stopping suddenly after heavy daily use can cause seizures. In a meta-analysis of 47 studies covering 23,518 people who used cannabis regularly or were dependent on it, 47% had cannabis withdrawal syndrome when they stopped. The rate was 17% in general population samples, 54% in outpatient samples and 87% in inpatient samples, and it was higher in daily users and in people who also used tobacco or other drugs19. Withdrawal is the subject of Section 5. The point here is that it is usually unpleasant rather than dangerous, and that it is most dangerous to the attempt, not to the body: in one study of adults who had tried to stop, 70.4% of those who had been through withdrawal had used cannabis to relieve it7.
2.2Who should talk to a doctor first
Some people should talk to a doctor before they stop. The first group is anyone who uses cannabis for a medical condition. Stopping can bring the condition back, and a doctor needs to plan what replaces it. The second is anyone who also drinks heavily every day or takes benzodiazepines or other sleeping or anxiety medication. Alcohol and benzodiazepine withdrawal can be dangerous, and there is a specific risk of swapping one for the other: in a study of 28 daily cannabis users who stopped for 13 days, those with a past alcohol problem increased their drinking by 52% while they were off cannabis, while those without one did not20. In another study of adults who had tried to stop, 41.5% had used alcohol to relieve cannabis withdrawal7.
The third group is anyone who has had psychosis, hallucinations or severe paranoia, or has a family history of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. In a study of first-episode psychosis across 11 sites in Europe and Brazil, daily cannabis use was associated with roughly three times the odds of a psychotic disorder compared with never using, and daily use of high-potency cannabis with nearly five times the odds21. A meta-analysis of 10 studies covering 66,816 people found the same dose pattern: the heaviest users had 3.9 times the odds of a psychotic outcome compared with people who didn't use, although the authors note that a causal link can't be firmly established22. In a Danish national register study, 47.4% of people diagnosed with a cannabis-induced psychosis between 1994 and 2014 were later diagnosed with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder23. Someone with that history needs psychiatric care alongside any attempt to stop. The fourth group is anyone with depression, especially with thoughts of self-harm: heavy cannabis use is associated with a higher risk of developing depression24, and the low mood of early withdrawal can make an existing depression feel worse for a few weeks.
Finally, anyone who has repeated bouts of severe nausea and vomiting while using cannabis should see a doctor. Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome is a cycle of vomiting linked to regular cannabis use. In a systematic review of 183 articles, everyone described had a history of regular cannabis use, 97.4% used it at least weekly, 92.3% took hot baths or showers for relief, and symptoms resolved after stopping cannabis in 96.8%; the authors conclude that stopping appears to be the best treatment25. Severe vomiting causes dehydration, which needs medical care.
2.3What a doctor can do
There is no approved medication for stopping cannabis. A Cochrane review of 21 randomized trials with 1,755 participants found that none of the medications tested, including THC preparations, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, buspirone and N-acetylcysteine, made abstinence at the end of treatment more likely than placebo26. A doctor can still help in three ways: by checking for and treating anything the cannabis was covering, such as anxiety, depression, pain or insomnia; by managing any alcohol or medication use safely; and by treating severe withdrawal symptoms, especially sleep, where short-term medical help has been tested in the laboratory27. Talking treatments have better evidence. A Cochrane review of 23 randomized trials with 4,045 participants found that psychosocial treatment reduced how often people used and how dependent they were, compared with minimal treatment, and that an intensive combination of motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral therapy and rewards for abstinence had the most consistent support. Rates of lasting abstinence were low across all of them28. Our program does not prescribe or recommend medication. It works alongside whatever medical care a person has, and it never replaces it.
03
3. Why is it so hard to quit weed when I'm in control everywhere else?
Days 10 to 17, Brain chemistry restabilization
In brief
Weed works on the brain's own system for calming stress and ending the day. Daily use turns that system down, so without weed you feel worse than you did before you started, and the habit runs on routine rather than on choice. The weed itself is also far stronger than it was.
Because weed doesn't only feel good. It borrows a system your brain uses every day to calm down, and daily use changes that system so that being without weed feels worse than normal. Self-control at work runs on clear goals, outside structure and a rested prefrontal cortex. Smoking happens at the end of the day, when the structure has gone, the prefrontal cortex is tired, and the urge has been learned so well that it runs before you've decided anything3, 29. Being good at your job doesn't protect you, because the part of you that is good at your job isn't the part that reaches for the grinder at nine at night.
3.1What THC does in the brain
The brain makes its own cannabis-like chemicals, called endocannabinoids, and has receptors for them throughout, the most common being the CB1 receptor. This system works like a dimmer switch on other signals: it turns down stress responses, helps regulate sleep, appetite, pain and memory, and shapes how rewarding things feel. Stress changes it in both directions. Morena and colleagues' review describes how stress lowers levels of one endocannabinoid, anandamide, which helps set off the stress response and anxiety, and raises another, which helps end the stress response; chronic stress reliably reduces CB1 receptors in almost every brain region studied30.
THC acts on the same CB1 receptors, more strongly and for longer than the brain's own chemicals do. That is why the first hit after a hard day works so well: it does in minutes what the brain's own system is struggling to do. THC also acts on the reward system. In a brain imaging study, THC caused dopamine release in the human striatum, the region at the centre of reward and habit learning31. Dopamine there is less about pleasure than about learning what to want: it fires most strongly when a reward is better than expected and moves, with repetition, to the things that predict the reward32, 33. The grinder, the lighter, the balcony, the end of the evening's work: each becomes a signal that something good is about to happen.
3.2What daily smoking does to it
The brain adapts to a flood of THC by turning its receptors down. In a brain imaging study of 30 men who smoked cannabis every day and 28 who did not, the daily smokers had about 20% fewer available CB1 receptors in the outer layers of the brain, the cortex, with a 21% reduction in the anterior cingulate, a region involved in attention and self-control. The longer they had smoked, the lower their receptor levels34. A second study, of 11 cannabis-dependent men and 19 controls, found receptor availability 15% lower in almost all brain regions35. Section 8 shows how quickly these receptors come back.
Daily use also seems to dampen the reward system itself. In a study using brain imaging, people who used cannabis had lower dopamine synthesis capacity in the striatum than controls, the difference was driven by those who met criteria for abuse or dependence, and the more they used, the lower it was36. In another, 24 people with a cannabis use disorder and 24 controls were given a drug that raises dopamine. The cannabis users had markedly blunted responses in brain, body and mood, and in the reward centre the blunting was linked to higher scores for negative emotion and to more severe addiction37. A review of THC and the dopamine system concludes that a single dose of THC increases dopamine release, while long-term use is associated with a blunted dopamine system38. In plain terms: the daily smoker's brain has adjusted to weed being there, and when it is gone, ordinary life feels duller than it should for a while.
3.3The weed is stronger than it used to be
The weed people smoke today is not the weed of thirty years ago. The University of Mississippi's potency monitoring program, which tests cannabis seized by US authorities, found that the average THC content of cannabis plant material rose from about 4% in 1995 to about 12% in 2014, while its CBD content, the compound that may soften some of THC's effects, fell, so that THC went from 14 times the CBD content to about 80 times39. Over the next decade the average rose from 8.9% in 2008 to 17.1% in 2017, and the concentrates used in vapes and dabs rose from 6.7% to 55.7% THC11. A meta-analysis of 12 studies from seven countries, covering cannabis samples from 1970 to 2017, found that THC in herbal cannabis rose by 0.29 percentage points a year and in resin by 0.57, while CBD did not change40.
A cannabis stalk drawn in fine ink against a ruler of THC percentages, with a leaf at each measured year. Average THC in US cannabis was about 4% in 1995, about 12% in 2014, 8.9% in 2008 and 17.1% in 2017, from two reports of the same monitoring program. Concentrates averaged 55.7% THC in 2017. The ratio of THC to CBD rose from 14 in 1995 to about 80 in 2014. Across eight studies of herbal cannabis from 1970 to 2017, THC rose by 0.29 percentage points a year.
Strength matters for stopping because it matters for dependence. Daily use of high-potency cannabis predicts more severe dependence15, and higher potency is associated with a higher risk of cannabis use disorder16. A habit built on 17% weed and concentrates is a bigger adjustment for the brain to make than one built on the weed of the 1990s, and the withdrawal that follows can be correspondingly harder. It is one reason that people who stopped easily at twenty find it much harder at thirty-five.
3.4From a choice to a habit
With repetition, behavior moves from deliberate, goal-directed control to habit, a process that runs on its own once the trigger is present29. Wood and Rünger describe habits as responses that are set off by the context in which they have been repeated, which is why they persist even when the person's goals have changed41. Stress speeds this shift: stressed people fall back on habits rather than on goal-directed choices4. In a daily smoker, the habit is linked to particular times, places, objects and moods. When 38 regular cannabis users who had not smoked for three days held a cannabis-related object during brain scanning, reward-related regions including the ventral tegmental area, the anterior cingulate, the insula and the amygdala responded more strongly than to a neutral object42. A meta-analysis of cue studies found that regular cannabis users react moderately to cannabis triggers, and that their attention locks onto them much more strongly than their reported craving would suggest43. The habit is often ahead of the person: by the time they notice the urge, attention has already gone to the weed.
That second target rests on research on how rewards compete. Bickel and colleagues describe addiction as, in part, a problem of valuing the immediate reward too highly and the delayed one too little, and argue that treatment should strengthen the value of delayed, effortful rewards44. Animal research finds that an enriched environment, with more to do, explore and learn, protects against and reduces drug seeking45. The new pursuit is not a distraction. It is a competing source of reward, built in the same hours as the habit.
04
4. Why do I smoke every day, from the first one in the morning to the last one before bed?
Days 3 to 15, Brain chemistry restabilization
In brief
Because weed has taken on jobs at fixed points in your day: getting going, ending work, handling stress, filling the evening and getting to sleep. Each time you smoke at the same time and in the same place, the habit gets stronger and the gap it would leave gets bigger.
Most daily smokers don't smoke at random. They smoke at the same points every day, and each of those points has a reason: the first one to get going or to take the edge off the morning, one at the end of work to switch off, one after an argument or a bad call, one in the evening because the evening is empty without it, and one to get to sleep. The reasons feel different, but they work the same way. Weed has become the tool for a job, and every time it does that job at that time and in that place, the link gets stronger41.
4.1Smoking to cope
People smoke weed for different reasons, and the reason matters. A meta-analysis of 48 studies with 11,274 participants looked at five motives: to cope with bad feelings, to enhance good ones, to be social, to fit in, and to expand awareness. When all five were considered together, coping was one of only two motives that independently predicted problems from cannabis use46. Smoking to feel better is the motive most closely tied to the habit getting out of hand, and it is the one that most daily smokers recognise when they are honest about the evening joint.
Stress sets the urge off directly. In a laboratory study, 87 people who were dependent on cannabis went through either a standard social stress test or a neutral task and were then shown cannabis triggers. Both the stress and the cannabis triggers raised craving47. Over time a second loop forms on top of the first. Once someone is dependent, part of what weed relieves is the irritability, restlessness and low mood of early withdrawal, which starts within a day or two of the last use6. In a study of 104 adults who had seriously tried to stop, withdrawal symptoms prompted people to act to relieve them, including by using cannabis, which the authors describe as negative reinforcement: the habit is kept going by the relief of feeling less bad48. Koob and Le Moal describe this shift, from using for pleasure to using to escape a low state the drug itself helped create, as central to addiction49.
4.2The first one of the day and the last one
Two points in the day deserve particular attention. The first is the morning. Screening tests for problem cannabis use, such as the Cannabis Abuse Screening Test, ask how often a person smokes before midday and how often they smoke alone, because both mark a habit that has moved from social use to a private daily routine50. For some people the morning joint is how the day starts. For others it is the evening one that does the damage to the morning. One of our clients described it this way: “Normally it was a struggle waking up. You can imagine if you have these bad habits in the evening that in the morning you wake up and it takes an hour, 2 hours to kickstart the day, to get yourself in the mood to do stuff.”
The second is the last one before bed. Many daily smokers no longer remember how to fall asleep without weed, and that is the hardest job to take away. THC can shorten the time it takes to fall asleep, but a review of the research concludes it may impair the quality of sleep over the long term51. When the evening joint stops, sleep is usually the first thing to break, and broken sleep is one of the strongest predictors of smoking again. Section 6 covers it in detail. Here the point is that the bedtime joint is often the one people least want to give up, because it is the one that seems to protect something they need.
A 24-hour dial drawn like a page in a field notebook, with the hours around the edge and five marked points where a daily smoker typically smokes: waking, to get going; the end of work, to switch off; after stress, to cope; the evening, to fill empty time; and bedtime, to fall asleep. Notes beside the dial say that screening tests ask about smoking before midday and alone, that coping is the motive most tied to problems, and that stress and cannabis triggers each raise craving. A toggle switches the dial to the program's day, where the same hours hold fixed sleep and wake times, morning daylight and a walk, training, meditation, a demanding new pursuit and an evening with the phone and light turned down.
4.3Habits that travel together
Weed rarely travels alone. Many people roll it with tobacco, smoke a cigarette with it or straight after, drink with it, or pair it with the phone, porn or food. Agrawal and colleagues' review of cannabis and tobacco describes shared genetic risk, shared routes of use and shared smoking triggers that keep both going, similar withdrawal syndromes, and early evidence that stopping both together predicts better results52. In a within-person study of 12 people who used both, withdrawal from cannabis alone and from tobacco alone was of similar size, and stopping both at once was more severe for a short time53. The cost of keeping one going is high: in laboratory studies of daily cannabis smokers, those who also smoked cigarettes were about 19 times more likely to smoke cannabis again when it became available2. Our clients describe the same thing. Two of them who came to us for weed came with other habits as well, and one described all three of his as one struggle: “These three things had a huge influence on my life. Not specifically the act of doing it, but the struggle I was going through for years and years and years trying to quit these bad habits.”
The order follows from the research. Stable routines are what habits run on, and a new routine placed in the same time and setting as the old habit can take over its context41. Light is the main signal that sets the body clock, and morning light in particular anchors sleep timing54. Circadian disruption and poor sleep are linked to substance use and relapse across drugs55. Building those anchors first means the first evening without weed is not an empty evening.
05
5. How long does weed withdrawal last, and what does it feel like?
Days 16 to 47
In brief
For a daily smoker, withdrawal usually starts within one to three days, is worst between days two and six, and fades over two to three weeks. Irritability, anxiety, low mood, poor appetite, bad sleep and strange dreams are the most common symptoms. Some, especially sleep and irritability, can last a month or more.
Most daily smokers feel withdrawal within one to three days of their last smoke, feel worst somewhere between day two and day six, and feel most symptoms fade within two weeks. In the study that first mapped the time course, 18 daily cannabis users were followed through five days of smoking as usual and 45 days without it. Withdrawal effects usually began between days 1 and 3, peaked between days 2 and 6, and most lasted 4 to 14 days, with a size and time course comparable to tobacco withdrawal6. A later review puts the usual length of the syndrome at up to three weeks18. Some symptoms last longer. In a study of chronic users who stopped for 28 days under supervision, symptoms were most pronounced in the first 10 days, but some were still present at the end of the 28 days56.
A field log of days 0 to 35 after stopping, drawn as a notebook ruler with a row for each part of withdrawal. Onset of withdrawal falls between days 1 and 3, the peak between days 2 and 6, and most symptoms last 4 to 14 days. Craving and sleeplessness peak on day 2 and strange, vivid dreams on day 4. The syndrome usually lasts up to about three weeks. Irritability and physical tension were still present at day 28 in one study. CB1 receptors begin to recover within 2 days and are back to normal by about four weeks.
5.1What it feels like
Cannabis withdrawal is mostly a syndrome of mood and behavior, with some physical symptoms57. In Budney's study, the effects that followed a withdrawal pattern were aggression, anger, anxiety, decreased appetite, weight loss, irritability, restlessness, shakiness, sleep problems and stomach pain6. In a national US survey of frequent cannabis users, 44.3% reported two or more withdrawal symptoms, and the symptoms fell into two groups: one of weakness, sleeping too much and slowed movement, and one of anxiety, restlessness, depression and insomnia58. Among adults trying to stop on their own, 95.5% reported at least one withdrawal symptom during their attempt, with a median of nine7. Women report stronger withdrawal than men, including physical symptoms such as nausea and stomach pain18.
| Symptom | What it is like | When |
|---|---|---|
| Irritability, anger, aggression | A short fuse, arguments over small things | From days 1 to 3; worst in the first week; can last a month6, 56 |
| Anxiety and restlessness | On edge, unable to settle, a sense that something is wrong | From days 1 to 3; worst days 2 to 66 |
| Low mood | Flat, bored, nothing seems worth doing | First weeks; reported as lasting longer than the physical symptoms18, 58 |
| Sleep problems | Trouble falling asleep, waking in the night, poor sleep | From the first nights; can last longer than other symptoms18, 59 |
| Strange, vivid dreams | Intense, often unsettling dreams, sometimes about smoking | Peak around day 4, later than other symptoms18 |
| Reduced appetite and weight loss | Not hungry, some nausea or stomach pain | First week or two6 |
| Craving | Strong urges to smoke, thoughts that keep coming back to it | Peak in the first days, then less often but strong when set off18, 43 |
| Shakiness, sweating, chills | Physical discomfort, usually mild | First days6, 18 |
5.2How many people get it
About half of people who use cannabis regularly get withdrawal when they stop. In the meta-analysis by Bahji and colleagues of 47 studies and 23,518 people, the pooled rate was 47%. It was 17% in general population samples, 54% in people treated as outpatients and 87% in people treated as inpatients, and it was higher among daily users and those who also used tobacco or had other substance problems19. The pattern is what you would expect from a syndrome driven by dose: the more and the longer someone has smoked, the more their brain has adapted, and the more there is to readjust.
Four seed heads of one hundred seeds each. In general population samples, 17 of every 100 regular cannabis users had withdrawal on stopping. In outpatient samples it was 54, in inpatient samples 87, and across all 47 studies 47.
5.3Why withdrawal decides so many attempts
Withdrawal matters less for what it does to the body than for what it does to the attempt. In a study of 49 cannabis-dependent adults who stopped for two weeks under monitoring, the more withdrawal interfered with their daily lives, the more likely they were to smoke during the attempt, and the more they were smoking a month later60. Among adults who had tried to stop on their own, 70.4% of those who had been through withdrawal had used cannabis to relieve it, and many had used alcohol or tobacco for the same purpose7. In laboratory studies, the daily smokers with more negative mood and more disrupted sleep during withdrawal were more likely to have a severe relapse when cannabis was offered again2. The first two weeks are when the attempt is most fragile, and the reason is usually not a lack of resolve. It is that the person feels worse than they have felt in years and knows exactly what would fix it.
That points to what helps. If withdrawal is mostly irritability, anxiety, low mood and bad sleep, then the person who has already rebuilt their sleep, built some daily exercise and learned a few ways to bring their stress down will feel it less and cope with it better. A small pilot study of 12 cannabis-dependent adults who were not trying to stop found that ten sessions of moderate treadmill exercise over two weeks cut their use from an average of 5.9 joints a day to 2.8 during the exercise period, and reduced craving61. It was a small, uncontrolled study, and it needs larger trials. But it fits with wider research on exercise as a treatment for drug use62.
Slow, structured breathing has been shown to lower negative mood and stress markers in healthy adults63, and naming an emotion in words reduces the amygdala's response to it64. Neither is a treatment for withdrawal on its own. They are tools for the irritable, anxious moments that are most likely to end an attempt in its first month.
06
6. Why can't I sleep after quitting weed, and why are my dreams so vivid?
Days 3 to 5, Brain chemistry restabilization
In brief
Daily THC suppresses dreaming sleep. When you stop, your brain makes up for it, so dreams come back intense and strange, and falling and staying asleep gets harder for the first weeks. Sleep usually settles within a month. Fixing your sleep routine before you stop makes those nights easier and protects the attempt.
Because your brain has been sleeping on THC, and it has to relearn how to sleep without it. Daily THC suppresses REM sleep, the stage in which most vivid dreaming happens. When the THC stops, REM comes back with extra force, a rebound, and the dreams that come with it are intense, strange and often about smoking. At the same time, falling asleep takes longer and you wake more in the night. For most people this is worst in the first one to two weeks and settles within about a month, though the research on exactly how long is thin18, 65.
6.1What weed does to sleep while you smoke
THC can make it quicker to fall asleep, which is why so many people use it at night. A review of cannabis and sleep concludes that THC may shorten the time it takes to fall asleep but could impair sleep quality over the long term51. The best-known laboratory work on this is old but clear. In studies by Feinberg and colleagues, experienced users given THC or cannabis extract every day had fewer of the rapid eye movements that mark REM sleep, with some tolerance to the effect. When the THC stopped abruptly, eye movement density during REM rose to extremely high levels and REM periods lengthened66. In plain terms, the daily smoker is not getting a normal amount of dream sleep, and the brain keeps count.
6.2The first nights without it
Sleep studies of people stopping cannabis show the same picture from several angles. In a laboratory study of 20 daily cannabis users who alternated between smoking as usual and three days without, abstinence brought less total sleep, lower sleep efficiency, a longer time to fall asleep, an earlier and larger share of REM sleep, and worse sleep quality as people rated it themselves27. In a study of 18 heavy users who stopped abruptly on an inpatient unit, sleep was recorded on nights 1, 2, 7, 8 and 13. Across those two weeks total sleep time and sleep efficiency fell, time awake after first falling asleep rose, and the amount of REM sleep declined from its early high59. Strange, vivid dreams tend to peak later than the other symptoms, around day 4 in an inpatient study18. A systematic review of 36 studies concluded that sleep is frequently disrupted during cannabis withdrawal, though differences in how studies measured it make the exact pattern hard to pin down65.
A row of fourteen nights drawn as moons in a notebook, with a night of smoking as usual at the start for comparison. On the first nights without weed, total sleep falls, it takes longer to fall asleep, sleep is less efficient and dreaming sleep rebounds above its usual level. Strange, vivid dreams peak around the fourth night. Over the two weeks, time awake in the night rises and the extra dreaming sleep declines from its early high. The figure shows directions of change, not measured sizes.
6.3Why sleep decides whether you smoke again
Sleep is not a side issue. It is one of the strongest links between withdrawal and smoking again. In a study of 55 cannabis-dependent military veterans making a self-guided attempt to stop, those who slept poorly before they stopped were more likely to smoke again within the first two days67. In laboratory studies, daily smokers whose sleep was more disrupted during withdrawal were more likely to relapse severely2. Bolla and colleagues conclude that poor sleep could contribute to treatment failure in heavy users and that sleep is a target for treatment in its own right59.
Part of the reason is what lost sleep does to the brain's control systems. Sleep deprivation weakens the prefrontal cortex's control over the amygdala, making emotional reactions stronger68, and in a brain imaging study a single night without sleep reduced the availability of dopamine D2 receptors in the ventral striatum, a change of the kind linked to impulsive reward-seeking69. A person who has slept four broken hours is more irritable, more anxious and less able to hold a plan, on the same days that withdrawal is making them irritable and anxious already. More broadly, disrupted body clocks and poor sleep are linked to substance use and relapse across drugs55.
07
7. How long does weed stay in your system after you quit?
In brief
THC dissolves in body fat and leaks back out slowly. In heavy daily smokers it can still be found in blood a month after stopping, and its breakdown products in urine for an average of about four weeks and sometimes longer. Being detectable is not the same as being high.
Longer than most people expect, if you smoke every day. THC dissolves in fat, and in a regular smoker it builds up in the body's fat stores and leaks back into the blood for weeks after the last smoke. In a study of 30 men who smoked cannabis daily and then stayed on a secure research unit, THC was still detectable in the blood of 2 of the 5 who stayed for 30 days, and its main breakdown product was still detectable in 4 of those 570. In an earlier study of 86 chronic users under strict supervision, urine tests stayed positive for an average of 27 days, and in some people for 46 consecutive days71. For an occasional user the time is much shorter. Being detectable is not the same as being high: the amounts that leak out of fat are small. But it does mean that a heavy smoker's body is still clearing THC through most of the first month.
7.1Where THC goes
Smoked THC reaches the blood within minutes: in one study, blood levels peaked at about nine minutes, before the last puffs had even been taken. From the blood it moves quickly into the brain and into fat, because THC dissolves far more readily in fat than in water. Huestis's review of human cannabinoid pharmacokinetics describes how, with prolonged exposure, THC concentrates in human fat and is retained for long periods, and how its release back from fat into the blood is the slowest step in clearing it from the body. In chronic users, a terminal half-life of about 4.1 days has been reported for THC in plasma, meaning it takes about four days for the remaining amount to halve, and then four more to halve again72.
A fine ink drawing of a fat cell filled with droplets of stored THC beside a blood vessel, above a time line from the last smoke to day 77. THC peaks in the blood about nine minutes after smoking. In chronic users its half-life in plasma has been reported as about 4.1 days. In one study, THC was still detectable in the blood of 2 of 5 heavy smokers at day 30, and its breakdown product in 4 of 5. In another, urine tests stayed positive for a mean of 27 days, for up to 46 consecutive days, and some people took up to 77 days to test negative for ten days in a row. Dragging along the time line shows the stored droplets thinning as the weeks pass, drawn at the 4.1-day half-life as a simplification.
7.2How long it can be found
The two best-supervised studies give a consistent picture. In Bergamaschi's study, 27 of the 30 daily smokers had THC in their blood on admission. It fell gradually: only 1 of the 11 still on the unit at 26 days had cleared it, and 5% of participants still had levels of at least 1 microgram per litre after 12 days70. In Ellis's study of urine, excretion was clearly two-phase: a faster early fall that did not continue, followed by a long, slow tail. During that tail most people had runs of negative tests lasting an average of three days, followed by at least one positive one71. The practical point for someone who has just stopped is that a positive test weeks later does not mean they have smoked, and a negative one does not mean the body has finished clearing it.
7.3Can stored THC affect you after you stop?
Possibly, a little, and mostly in ways that are hard to feel. In rats given repeated THC, a day without food or a dose of the stress hormone ACTH raised blood THC by releasing it from fat; the authors called this reintoxication and noted that whether it has functional effects in people was unknown73. In people, 14 regular cannabis users who did 35 minutes of exercise on a stationary bike had a small but significant rise in blood THC afterwards, larger in people with a higher body mass index; a short fast did not have the same effect74. Bergamaschi and colleagues note that THC lingering in the blood for a month fits the time course of the subtle thinking problems that persist in the first weeks after stopping70. None of this is a reason to avoid exercise, which helps with sleep, mood and craving. It is a reason to expect the first month to feel unfinished: the body is still clearing what it stored.
08
8. How long does it take for your brain to recover after quitting weed?
Days 24 to 30, Brain chemistry restabilization
In brief
The cannabinoid receptors that daily smoking turns down start coming back within two days of stopping and are back to normal in most of the brain within about four weeks. Thinking and memory mostly recover within the first month too. The habit itself, the learned urge and its triggers, takes much longer to fade.
Faster than most people fear, in the parts that are best measured. In brain imaging studies, the CB1 receptors that daily smoking turns down began to recover within two days of stopping and were back to normal levels in most of the brain within about four weeks34, 35. That time frame matches the length of withdrawal, which a review suggests it may help explain18. Thinking and memory follow a similar course, covered in Section 9. What does not reset in four weeks is the habit: the learned link between weed and the times, places, people and moods where you smoked. That part is slower, and it is what most of the 90 days are for.
8.1The receptors come back
Two imaging studies have tracked the receptors directly. Hirvonen and colleagues scanned 30 daily cannabis smokers and 28 controls, found about 20% fewer available CB1 receptors in the smokers' cortex, and then rescanned 14 of the smokers after 26 days, on average, of continuously monitored abstinence on a secure research unit (range 13 to 32 days). Receptor levels had increased specifically in the regions that had been reduced, and were back to normal in most of them. The exception was the hippocampus, a region central to memory, which did not show the same reversal in that time34. D'Souza and colleagues scanned 11 cannabis-dependent men at baseline and after 2 and 28 days of monitored abstinence. At baseline their receptor availability was 15% lower than in 19 controls. After just two days, the difference was no longer statistically significant, and people with lower receptor levels at day 2 had more withdrawal symptoms. At 28 days there was no significant difference from controls35.
A meadow of fine ink stems, one hundred for the receptor level in people who do not smoke. In the first study, daily smokers start with about 80 stems in the cortex, about 20% fewer, and after about four weeks of abstinence the meadow is back to its full height in most regions, but not in the hippocampus. In the second study, dependent men start with 85, 15% fewer; after two days the gap is no longer statistically significant, and at 28 days there is no significant difference.
8.2The reward system and mood
The dopamine findings in Section 3 come from people who were still using, and there is less direct evidence on how fast they recover. What the research does show is that the blunted dopamine response in heavy users was linked to negative emotion and to the severity of the addiction37, and that lower dopamine synthesis tracked how much people used36. Both fit what people describe in the first weeks after stopping: ordinary pleasures feel muted, and boredom is hard to bear. Both also point to what helps: rewards that take effort and come from real activity, rebuilt deliberately rather than waited for. Lasting changes in the brain's reward and habit circuits after long drug use are thought to underlie the risk of relapse that outlasts withdrawal9.
8.3The habit takes longer
Receptor recovery is the brain undoing its adaptation to THC. The habit is something else: learning. Stopping does not erase what was learned. Bouton's work on extinction shows that when a learned response stops being rewarded, the original learning is not deleted. A new, competing memory is laid down, and it is tied to the context in which it was learned, which is why the old response can return in a new setting, after time passes or after a single reminder75. A weed habit learned on a particular sofa, with particular friends, at the end of particular kinds of day, will still be there when those return, long after the receptors have recovered. That is why the program's second and third months work on triggers, thoughts and identity rather than on the body.
09
9. Will my memory and motivation come back after quitting weed?
Days 20 to 23, Brain chemistry restabilization
In brief
For most adults, yes. The memory problems linked to heavy smoking are mostly tied to recent use and largely fade within a month, much of it in the first week. Weed reduces motivation while you're high. The exception is heavy use that started in adolescence and went on for decades, where some loss may not fully reverse.
For most adults, memory and concentration come back within weeks of stopping. The best evidence suggests that the memory problems seen in heavy smokers are mostly residual effects of recent use and withdrawal, not permanent damage. In studies that required people to have been off cannabis for more than three days, the difference between users and non-users was small and not statistically significant76. In studies that required at least 25 days, there was no significant difference in any area of thinking measured77. Motivation is more complicated. Weed reduces the willingness to work for rewards while you're under its effects, and the first weeks after stopping often feel flat. But studies of dependent users who were not high have found their motivation largely intact.
9.1Memory
The clearest study followed people through a supervised month without cannabis. Pope and colleagues tested 63 current heavy users, who had smoked at least 5,000 times and were smoking daily, 45 former heavy users and 72 people who had barely used it, on days 0, 1, 7 and 28 of a 28-day washout monitored by urine tests. On days 0, 1 and 7 the current heavy users scored significantly worse at recalling word lists, and the deficit tracked how much cannabis was in their urine at the start. By day 28 there were virtually no significant differences between the groups on any test, and no link between lifetime cannabis use and test scores78. A randomized trial in 88 regular users aged 16 to 25 assigned 62 to four weeks of abstinence and 26 to keep using as usual. The abstinent group's verbal learning improved, and the improvement came mostly in the first week79.
Two meta-analyses fit the same picture. Scott and colleagues pooled 69 studies of 2,152 young cannabis users and 6,575 comparison participants. Frequent or heavy use was associated with a small reduction in thinking ability overall, an effect size of -0.25. In the 15 studies that required more than 72 hours of abstinence, the effect shrank to -0.08 and was no longer distinguishable from zero, against -0.30 in studies with shorter or no abstinence76. Schreiner and Dunn found no significant effect on global performance or any of eight areas of thinking in the 13 studies that tested users after at least 25 days of abstinence, and concluded that negative residual effects are limited to the first 25 days77.
Two pressed specimens on a scale of effect sizes from minus 0.4 to plus 0.1. In studies with less than 72 hours of abstinence, frequent cannabis users scored lower than non-users, with an effect size of minus 0.30 and a 95% confidence interval from minus 0.37 to minus 0.22. In studies with more than 72 hours of abstinence, the effect was minus 0.08, with an interval from minus 0.22 to plus 0.07, crossing zero. Below, a 28-day washout: heavy users recalled word lists significantly worse than non-users on days 0, 1 and 7, and there was no significant difference on day 28.
9.2The exception: starting young and smoking for decades
The reassuring findings above come mostly from adults and from studies over weeks or months. The most important caution comes from the Dunedin study, which followed 1,037 people in New Zealand from birth to age 38 and tested their thinking at 13, before any cannabis use, and again at 38. People who used cannabis persistently showed a decline across many areas of thinking, even after accounting for education, and people who knew them noticed more problems with memory and attention. The decline was concentrated in those who started in adolescence, it was larger the more persistent the use, and stopping did not fully restore functioning in the adolescent-onset users80. The hippocampus finding in Section 8 points the same way34. For someone who started young and smoked for decades, most of the recovery in the first month is still real, but some of the loss may not come back, which is one more reason to stop now rather than later.
9.3Motivation
The idea that weed makes people unmotivated is half right. In a well-controlled laboratory study, a dose of cannabis reduced people's willingness to choose high-effort tasks for money, compared with placebo: a short-lived amotivational state while under its effects. The same study found that cannabis-dependent people tested while not intoxicated chose effortful tasks as often as controls did, though they learned from rewards less well81. A later study of adults and adolescents who used cannabis three to four days a week found no more apathy and no difference in effort for rewards, wanting or liking than in non-users82. A review of cannabis and behavior describes the evidence on lasting amotivation as mixed and calls for better studies83.
For a daily smoker, though, the distinction between acute and lasting effects is academic, because a daily smoker is under acute effects most of the time. If someone smokes from the evening into the night and again in the morning, the short-lived amotivational state is most of their waking life. When they stop, they have to go through withdrawal's flat, irritable weeks first. Then the motivation that was being taken each day can return. One of our clients described the change this way: “Focus on work has been through the roof because my mind doesn't get disturbed anymore with wasteless thoughts, so now I'm using my mind to actually think about my business, about how I can improve on my life.”
Executive functions such as working memory, attention control and flexible thinking can be improved with practice, and they are among the first things to suffer under stress, poor sleep and poor fitness5. The training also has a second job: progress the client can see is evidence, against the fear that weed has done permanent damage, that their mind is coming back.
10
10. Can I just take a tolerance break or cut down instead of quitting?
Days 15 to 43
In brief
A tolerance break lowers your tolerance, because receptors start recovering within days. It doesn't change the habit, and it ends on a date you already know. Cutting down works for some people with milder problems. For a daily smoker who has already tried to control it, stopping completely is the more reliable route.
A tolerance break does what its name says: it lowers your tolerance, because the receptors that daily smoking turned down start recovering within two days and are close to normal within about four weeks34, 35. What it doesn't do is change why you smoke. The triggers, the evening, the sleep problem and the stress are all waiting on the day the break ends, and so is a brain that will now feel the first joint more strongly. Many breaks also end at the worst possible time. A one-week break ends just after the peak of withdrawal, and a two-week break ends while sleep is still disturbed. Cutting down can work for people with milder problems, but people with more severe problems are more likely to aim for abstinence, and for a daily smoker who has already tried rules and limits, stopping completely is usually the more reliable choice.
10.1What the research on goals shows
In a trial of 291 adults seeking help for cannabis, those with more problems and more symptoms of dependence were more likely to choose abstinence as their goal. People tended to reach outcomes consistent with the goal they chose, and their confidence that they could reach it predicted whether they did, for both moderation and abstinence84. That is a fair result for moderation. But it also shows who moderation suits: people whose problem is milder. Someone who smokes every day, has tried limits before and is reading this paper is usually in the other group.
There are three reasons controlled use is hard for a daily smoker. First, each session keeps the receptors turned down, so withdrawal never gets the chance to finish, and every day off is a day of mild withdrawal pressing for the next session. Second, each session reactivates the learned link between weed and its triggers. Extinction research shows that a learned response returns most readily when the old reward comes back, even briefly75. Third, a limit has to be enforced at the moment self-control is weakest: late in the evening, tired, possibly already high. Early lapses after stopping are also strongly associated with going back to heavier use: in the outpatient study described in Section 1, 71% of people who smoked again went on to relapse to heavier use, and earlier lapses were more strongly linked to relapse1.
| What it affects | Tolerance break | Cutting down | Stopping completely |
|---|---|---|---|
| Receptors | Start recovering within days35 | Stay partly turned down | Back to normal in most regions within about four weeks34 |
| Withdrawal | Felt in full, then cut off at the end of the break | Mild and constant, pressing for the next session | Felt in full for two to three weeks, then fades6 |
| The learned habit | Paused, then reactivated by the first session | Reactivated by every session75 | Begins to weaken; triggers still need a plan |
| Who it suits | People who want lower tolerance, not to stop | People with milder problems who choose moderation84 | Daily smokers, and anyone whose limits have failed before |
10.2Switching products
Switching from joints to edibles, vapes or CBD-heavy strains changes the route, not the habit. Concentrates for vaping averaged 55.7% THC in 2017, against 17.1% for plant material, so a switch to vaping can raise the dose rather than lower it11. CBD on its own does not get people high, but for someone dependent on THC it keeps the ritual, the product and the shop in their routine. And no medication, including THC preparations given as a substitute, has been shown to make abstinence more likely26.
10.3Tobacco and alcohol
The habits weed travels with need a decision of their own. For tobacco the evidence leans toward stopping both: a review of cannabis and tobacco reports early evidence that stopping both together predicts better results52, and in laboratory studies daily cannabis smokers who also smoked cigarettes were about 19 times more likely to relapse2. Stopping both at once makes withdrawal more severe for a short time53, which is one more reason to rebuild sleep and routine first. For alcohol the risk is substitution. People with a past alcohol problem drank 52% more while off cannabis in one study20, and 41.5% of adults trying to stop on their own used alcohol to ease cannabis withdrawal7. Anyone who drinks heavily every day should see a doctor before stopping alcohol, because alcohol withdrawal can be dangerous.
10.4The thoughts that argue for one more
Weed comes with an unusually persuasive set of permission thoughts, because some of them are partly true. It's legal here. It's a plant. It helps me sleep. It's less harmful than drinking. I'll just have one at the weekend. I've been good all week. Each of these is a reason to smoke dressed up as a fact, and each tends to arrive at the moment the urge does. Trying not to think them makes them come back: in Wegner's classic studies, people told not to think about a white bear thought about it more, especially once they were allowed to again85. Approaches that teach people to notice a thought, name it and choose an action anyway have a stronger record86. People also predict badly, in a calm state, how much an urge will push them later8, which is why an answer prepared in advance holds up better than one made up on the spot.
11
11. How do I quit weed when my friends or my partner still smoke?
Days 38 to 80
In brief
Plan each situation in advance, change where and how you see the people you smoked with, keep weed out of your home, and spend more time with people who don't smoke. Smoking spreads through social ties, and so does stopping. Your sense of who you are has to move with you.
By deciding in advance what happens in each situation, rather than on the night. Weed is often social in a specific way: one group of friends you always smoke with, a partner who smokes, a flat where it's always out, a ritual after football or at the end of the week. Those people and places are triggers in exactly the sense Section 3 describes, and they also carry an identity, the version of you that smokes. You don't have to lose the people. You do have to change the settings, keep weed out of the home you live in, plan the occasions you can't avoid, and add time with people for whom not smoking is normal.
11.1Smoking and stopping spread through social ties
The best long-term evidence on how a smoking habit moves through social networks comes from tobacco. In Christakis and Fowler's analysis of a large social network followed over three decades, people stopped smoking in clusters, and a person's chance of smoking fell substantially when a spouse, sibling, friend or coworker stopped87. For cannabis itself, the clearest shared link is with tobacco: the two are often smoked together, and shared routes of use and shared smoking triggers may help keep both going52. A change in the network can also be built deliberately. In a randomized trial with people treated for alcohol dependence, a treatment designed to shift a person's social network toward support for abstinence changed their networks and improved outcomes88. No equivalent trial exists for cannabis, so this is an inference from other substances, not a proven result for weed.
11.2A partner who smokes
Living with someone who smokes is the hardest version of this, because the trigger is in the home every evening. The practical options are limited and concrete: an agreement that weed is not kept or smoked in shared space while you stop, a different evening routine for the first month so you are not on the same sofa at the same hour, and an honest conversation about what you need. The research on extinction explains why the setting matters so much: what is learned about a trigger in one context does not automatically carry over to another, and the old response comes back most easily in the place it was learned75. Changing the situation before the urge starts is far more reliable than resisting it once it has89.
11.3Who you are now
For many daily smokers, weed is part of who they are: the relaxed one, the one who always has some, the one whose evenings look a certain way. Oyserman's identity-based motivation model holds that people act in ways that feel congruent with the identities that are salient to them in the moment90. A person who thinks of themselves as a smoker taking a break is still a smoker, and the identity will argue for the next session. Best and colleagues describe recovery as a social identity transition: people move away from groups whose identity is bound up with use and toward groups whose identity supports recovery, and the new memberships support the new self-description91. That is why the program's third month works on identity and on the people and places that still pull a person back, after the habit has been off for more than six weeks and there is evidence for a new self-description to rest on.
Rehearsal rests on a long line of research. Driskell, Copper and Moran's meta-analysis found that mental practice reliably improves performance, though less than physical practice92. Implementation intentions, plans in the form “if this happens, then I will do that”, made people more likely to reach their goals across many studies, because the response is linked to the situation in advance and does not have to be decided under pressure93.
12
12. What should I do if I smoke weed again after quitting?
Day 49 onward
In brief
Treat it as an event with a cause, not as the end of the attempt. Go back to your plan the next day, work out what set it off and add a response for it. Most people who stop smoke again at some point, and what happens next depends largely on how they explain it to themselves.
Go back to your plan the next day, and find out what happened. A single smoke after stopping is common, and it does not undo the weeks before it: your receptors will not be back where they were after one joint, and the work you did on sleep and routine is still there. What turns one smoke into a return to daily use is usually not the smoke itself but the conclusion drawn from it: I've blown it, so it doesn't matter now. The useful conclusion is narrower. Something set it off, the plan didn't cover it, and the plan can be changed this week.
12.1How often it happens, and when
Smoking again is common, and the risk lasts longer than withdrawal does. In Moore and Budney's study of 82 people who had stayed off cannabis for at least two weeks during outpatient treatment, 71% used at least once within six months. The average time to that first use was 73 days, long after withdrawal had ended. Of those who used, 71% went on to relapse to heavier use, defined as at least four days of use in a week, and early lapses were more strongly associated with relapse1. Across other drugs, the relapse curve has the same shape: losses are steepest soon after stopping and slow down as time without the drug builds up94. A review of cannabis use disorder treatment describes enduring abstinence as an uncommon outcome even with the best-tested treatments13.
A ledger of 100 small plant marks for 100 people who stayed off cannabis for at least two weeks during outpatient treatment. Over six months, 71 used cannabis at least once, on average 73 days after stopping. About 50 of the 100, 71% of those who used, relapsed to heavier use of at least four days a week. 29 did not use at all. The counts per 100 are calculated from the published percentages.
12.2How you explain it decides what happens next
Research on how people interpret a lapse explains why the same smoke ends one attempt and not another. In a study of people stopping tobacco, those who blamed a lapse on internal, stable causes they felt they couldn't control, such as a lack of willpower or a basic weakness, were more likely to return to regular smoking than those who saw the lapse as caused by a specific, changeable situation95. Witkiewitz and Marlatt's model of relapse treats a lapse as part of a dynamic process, in which stress, mood, thoughts and coping skills interact moment to moment, rather than as a single failure of character96. A lapse explained as a missing plan for a trigger is a reason to add a plan. A lapse explained as proof that you can't do it is a reason to stop trying.
12.3The urge itself is temporary
Most lapses happen during a craving, and a craving is shorter than it feels. Kavanagh, Andrade and May's elaborated intrusion theory describes how a brief thought about weed turns into a vivid, sustained craving as the mind elaborates it into imagery: the smell, the first draw, the relief97. The urge is strongest while that picture is being built, and it fades when attention moves on. In an experiment with 123 people who smoked cigarettes, a brief instruction in urge surfing, watching the urge rise and fall without acting on it, did not reduce how strong the urges felt, but it did lead to fewer cigarettes over the following week98. That study was in tobacco, not cannabis. We cite it for what it shows about urges in general: the practice changes what a person does with an urge, not whether the urge comes.
13
13. What does the Phalanx program target for someone stopping weed, and when?
Days 81 to 90, Identity rewiring
In brief
Ninety days in three phases. The first month rebuilds sleep, the body clock, exercise and the shape of the day, and weed stops on Day 15 with the habits stacked on it. The second month maps every trigger and builds a response for each. The third works on identity and the people and places that still pull toward smoking. Six months of aftercare follow.
The Behavior Control System is the same 90-day program for every habit, applied to the loop beneath each person's smoking. It asks for about thirty minutes of focused work a day: a short lesson each morning, a brief log each night, and a set of daily practices, which the program calls north stars, built into the routine the person already has. Days 1 to 30 rebuild the ground weed has been running on: sleep, the body clock, daylight, exercise, stress and a structured day. The client stops weed on Day 15, after two weeks of that work, along with the tobacco, drinking or other habits that travel with it. Days 31 to 60 work on the moment smoking actually happens: every trigger is mapped, the ones that can be removed are removed, and a prepared response is built for each of the rest. Days 61 to 90 work on who the client is becoming and on the people, routines and cultures around them. Six months of aftercare follow. This section states what each stretch targets and why, for someone stopping weed. It doesn't publish how: the exercises, their steps and their wording stay inside the program.
13.1Before Day 1
Every program starts with a Root-Cause Diagnostic: an application describing the habits involved and what has already been tried, followed by a thirty-minute, one-on-one conversation with our team. For weed it has two jobs. The first is safety. It asks how much and how often the person smokes, what they use with it, whether they use cannabis for a medical reason, what medication they take, and about any history of psychosis, mania or self-harm (Section 2). Anyone in those groups is told to see a doctor before they begin. The second job is to identify the loop beneath the smoking: what sets it off, what each smoke does for the person and what keeps the habit going. Our team reads that loop across three areas that addiction research uses to describe it: urges set off by triggers, the low or anxious states the habit relieves, and the planning and self-control that should stop it99. The rest of the program is applied to that loop.
A preparatory phase, Phase 0, follows before Day 1 and does not count toward the 90 days. It separates the decision to stop from the start. The client sets out in concrete terms the life they are building and what weed has cost it, makes a commitment to someone who matters to them, chooses a start date that marks a real boundary in their life, and proves to themselves that they can hold one full day of control. Dates that feel like a new beginning make people more likely to start on a goal100, and the most reliable source of confidence that a change is possible is the direct experience of having done it, even once101.
A single plant stem drawn upward through 90 days in three phases. Leaves mark the days on which targets are introduced. Days 1 to 30, brain chemistry restabilization: a nightly log from Day 1, fixed sleep and wake times on Day 3, a day built on fixed anchors on Day 9, the case for stopping completely on Day 10, weed and the habits stacked on it stop on Day 15, a demanding new pursuit on Day 17, memory and game training on Day 20, and evidence of recovery on Day 24. Days 31 to 60, impulse control: a full trigger map on Day 31, social situations planned on Day 38, permission thoughts on Day 40, stress and emotion on Day 44, urge observation on Day 49 and a response for every trigger on Day 52. Days 61 to 90, identity rewiring: identity work begins on Day 61, rehearsing high-risk situations on Day 71 and replacing what weed did on Day 81. Six months of aftercare follow.
| Days | Target | Why it matters for stopping weed |
|---|---|---|
| Before Day 1 | Root-Cause Diagnostic: the loop beneath the smoking, and a safety check for psychosis, mood and medical use | Daily high-potency use is associated with psychosis21; the loop is read across trigger-set urges, negative emotion and executive function99 |
| Before Day 1 | Commitment, a meaningful start date, one day of control | Fresh starts and direct experience of success raise follow-through100, 101 |
| 1 to 2 | How the loop works; the nightly log | Recorded monitoring of progress improves goal attainment102 |
| 3 to 5 | Sleep and wake times, daylight, evening light, phone out of the bedroom | Poor sleep before a quit attempt predicted lapse in the first two days67 |
| 6 | Progressive resistance training and cardio | In a pilot with 12 daily users, use fell from 5.9 to 2.8 joints a day during two weeks of exercise61 |
| 7 | Daily meditation | Groundwork for watching an urge without acting on it98 |
| 8 | Nutrition, at a general level | Appetite often drops in the first days of withdrawal6 |
| 9 | A day built on fixed anchors | Stable routines fill the hours in which habits run41 |
| 10 to 14 | The loop, the case for stopping completely, the reward inventory, self-assessment | Daily use leaves CB1 receptor availability about a fifth lower in much of the cortex34 |
| 15 | Weed stops, with the habits stacked on it | Each smoke reactivates learned links to its triggers75; tobacco and cannabis keep each other going52 |
| 16 to 23 | Heat and cold exposure, a demanding new pursuit, awareness training, memory training, practice days | Withdrawal usually peaks in the first week57; earned rewards compete with the habit44 |
| 24 to 30 | Perspective, evidence of recovery, how triggers are learned | CB1 receptors returned to normal within about four weeks34, 35 |
| 31 to 32 | Full trigger map; weed, gear and easy access removed | Changing the situation beats resisting an urge already under way89 |
| 33 to 39 | Why early abstinence is hard, the response sequence, social situations, breaking the routine | A lapse often comes weeks after withdrawal ends, on average 73 days in1 |
| 40 to 43 | Permission thoughts | Pushing a thought away makes it return85 |
| 44 to 51 | Emotion, stress, breathing, relaxation, urge observation, an earned reward, the future self | Smoking to cope with bad feelings is linked to more frequent use and more problems46 |
| 52 to 60 | A response for every trigger; daily practice and a craving record | If-then plans improve follow-through on goals93 |
| 61 to 70 | Identity, smoking culture, outside pressures, limiting beliefs | Stopping smoking spreads through social ties87 |
| 71 to 80 | Rehearsal of high-risk situations | Mental practice improves performance92 |
| 81 to 90 | Replacing each function weed served; review of the 90 days | A new routine takes weeks to months to become automatic103 |
| After 90 | Self-forgiveness, identity reinforcement, six months of aftercare | How a lapse is explained predicts whether it becomes a relapse95 |
13.2Why the order matters for weed
The order follows from the research in Sections 2 to 12. Weed stops after sleep has had almost two weeks of work, because sleep recorded in the lab got worse, not better, across the first two weeks without cannabis, and poor sleep before a quit attempt is linked to smoking again within days59, 67. The evening also needs something already in it on the first night without weed, which is why exercise, a fixed shape to the day and a demanding new pursuit begin before or alongside the stop. The habits that travel with weed stop on the same day, because a cigarette, a drink or a scroll that stays in the evening keeps the old setting alive and acts as a trigger for the rest52. The trigger work comes in the second month, when withdrawal has mostly passed but the risk of smoking again is still high, because lapses tend to come weeks after the stop, not days1. The identity and social work comes last, because who a person spends their evenings with and who they think they are carry the habit long after the receptors have recovered87, 90.
Replacement is the last step because a habit that served a function leaves a gap when it stops, and a gap left empty tends to be filled by whatever is most available. A replacement placed at the same time and in the same setting as the old smoke can take over its context41. Lally and colleagues found that the automaticity of a new daily behavior built gradually, reaching 95% of its plateau after a median of 66 days with wide variation between people, and that missing a single day did not reset the process103. That is part of why the program runs for 90 days and is followed by six months of aftercare.
13.3In our clients' words
Two of our clients who smoked weed have described their experience on the record. Marcel R., a commercial director in the Netherlands, had smoked weed and cigarettes for about 15 years and had tried seriously to stop at least ten times. He described the early weeks plainly: “It can be painful, emotions come up, sleep gets disturbed. It's a true process, like the first few weeks felt like months and then the last few weeks flew by like it was days.” When he recorded his interview, he had gone four months without weed, cigarettes or endless scrolling: “I'm totally done with all three of these bad habits. I haven't been doing them, not a single time. It's out of my system.”
Juan Carlos, a senior product manager in Spain, came to us mainly for porn, and smoked weed as well. He described what the habits had done to his days: “It was kind of my day-to-day. I was just waiting to arrive home to indulge myself. I was doing okay, but I wasn't fulfilled.” And of the program as a whole: “And if I have to describe this in one sentence, I will say that it's a system that works.” Their accounts are individual experiences, not a measure of results; our figures, and what they do and don't show, are in Section 14.
14
14. What do our results show, and what can't this paper tell you?
In brief
We report a 97% success rate, meaning clients who ran the program and stayed off the habit through the program and six months of aftercare. It comes from our own client follow-up, not from a controlled trial, and the research in this paper supports each part of the method without testing the whole.
Phalanx Labs has worked with 290+ clients across 12 countries over 7 years. Of those clients, 98.4% had already tried and failed to stop before they came to us. Our success rate is 97%, defined as the share of clients who ran the program and stayed off the habit through the program and the six months of aftercare that follow it. That rate covers all of our clients and all of the habits they came with. We don't publish a separate rate for weed. Because the definition matters as much as the number, we set out below what each figure counts, how it is known and what it does not establish.
| Figure | What it counts | How it is known |
|---|---|---|
| 290+ clients | People who have worked with Phalanx Labs over 7 years | Client records |
| 12 countries | Countries in which those clients lived while working with us | Client records |
| 98.4% | Share of clients who had already tried and failed to stop before they came to us | What clients reported about their history in their application and the diagnostic |
| 97% success rate | Clients who ran the program and stayed off the habit through the program plus 6 months of aftercare | Client follow-up across the program and the six months of aftercare |
14.1How outcomes are tracked
Throughout the program, the client keeps a nightly log and completes a weekly progress update. These are written records of what happened, what was difficult and what was handled; they are not scored instruments. At the end of each of the first two phases the client has a progress call with our team, the first around Day 28 and the second after Day 60. During aftercare we follow up with clients on whether they have stayed off the habit. A client counts as a success when they have run the program and stayed off the habit through the program and the full six months of aftercare.
14.2What our figures do not show
- Self-report. Whether a client has stayed off weed is known from what the client tells us, not from urine, blood or hair testing. Testing would also be a blunt tool here, because THC metabolites can stay in the urine of a heavy smoker for weeks after the last use (Section 7).
- Selection. Clients choose to apply, are accepted after a diagnostic in which we decline people we can't help, and are counted only if they ran the program. People who decide to work with us may differ in motivation or circumstance from people who don't.
- No comparison group. We can't say how many of the same people would have stopped through another route, such as a talking treatment, a mutual-help group or stopping alone, over the same period.
- Time window. The success rate covers the program and six months of aftercare. It does not describe what happens after that, and the relapse research in Section 12 shows that risk continues for months after stopping.
- All habits together. The rate is across every habit our clients bring. We don't report a rate for weed alone, and a single rate does not predict the outcome for any one person.
14.3What the research in this paper does not show
The studies cited here have their own limits, and readers should weigh them. Many of the cannabis studies are small. The withdrawal time course rests heavily on an outpatient study of 18 people and an inpatient study of 186, 59; the two receptor imaging studies scanned 30 and 11 daily smokers34, 35; and the exercise study was a pilot with 12 participants and no control group61. A systematic review of sleep during cannabis withdrawal concluded that methodological problems in most studies prevent firm conclusions about which parts of sleep are affected65. Much of the potency data comes from the United States and from samples seized by law enforcement, which may not match what any one person buys11, 39. The memory findings are averages across many studies with different designs, and the long-term studies cannot fully separate the effect of cannabis from the reasons some people start young and smoke heavily76, 80. Some findings come from tobacco rather than cannabis, such as the research on urge surfing and on how a lapse is explained95, 98; we use those for the mechanism they describe and say so where we cite them.
Other approaches have stronger trial evidence than ours. A Cochrane review of 23 randomized trials found that psychosocial treatment, especially an intensive combination of motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral therapy and rewards for abstinence, reduced how often people used and how dependent they were28. In one of those trials, Budney and colleagues randomly assigned 90 adults dependent on cannabis to cognitive behavioral therapy, rewards for verified abstinence, or both, over 14 weeks: the rewards produced longer stretches of continuous abstinence during treatment, and adding cognitive behavioral therapy helped people keep that abstinence over the following year104. Even so, the reviewers describe lasting abstinence as uncommon13. Our method has not been tested in a randomized or controlled trial, its outcomes have not been assessed independently, and it has not been published in a peer-reviewed journal. The research supports the reasoning behind each element. It does not show that the combination works, or how much each element contributes. The figures in Table 5 are our evidence for the combination, with the limits stated above. A controlled evaluation would need independent outcome assessment, a comparison condition and follow-up beyond six months. We would welcome one.
15
15. When should you see a doctor, and what is this program not?
In brief
See a doctor before you stop if you use cannabis for a medical condition, also drink heavily or take sleeping or anxiety medication, have a history of psychosis, or are pregnant. Get help at once for thoughts of self-harm. The program is not therapy, clinical care or medical treatment, and it works alongside a doctor, never instead of one.
See a doctor before you stop smoking weed if you use cannabis for a medical condition such as pain, epilepsy, nausea or sleep, if you also drink heavily every day or take benzodiazepines or other sleeping or anxiety medication, if you have ever had psychosis, hallucinations, severe paranoia or mania, if you have depression, or if you are pregnant. A doctor can check for and treat what the cannabis may have been covering, manage any alcohol or medication safely and help with severe withdrawal symptoms, especially sleep26, 27. If you have repeated bouts of severe vomiting while you use, see a doctor25. If you have thoughts of harming yourself, contact emergency services or a crisis line now.
Phalanx Labs is a behavior and performance engineering firm. The Behavior Control System is a structured method for changing behavior. It is not therapy, clinical care or medical treatment, and it does not diagnose or treat any medical or psychiatric condition. Our team does not act as the client's doctor or therapist, and the program does not replace either. Where the diagnostic suggests a medical or psychiatric risk, we tell the person to see a doctor before they begin.
Some of the program's physical practices carry ordinary risks of their own. Cold and heat exposure and starting a training program are not suitable for everyone, and people with heart conditions, high blood pressure or other medical conditions should check with their doctor first. The program gives general information about supplements and tells clients to consult a doctor before taking any; it does not prescribe or recommend medication or supplements.
The program is also not designed for every situation. It is not a crisis service. It is not suitable as the only support for someone with a serious mental health condition, someone at risk of harming themselves or others, or someone whose substance use needs medically supervised treatment. The diagnostic exists partly to identify these situations, and when we can't help, we say so and suggest the person seek appropriate care.
References
Numbered in the order the paper first cites them. Each links to the study itself.
- 1
Moore BA, Budney AJ (2003). Relapse in outpatient treatment for marijuana dependence. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 25(2), 85-89.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-5472(03)00083-7Cited in Section 1, Section 10, Section 12, Section 13
- 2
Haney M, Bedi G, Cooper ZD, Glass A, Vosburg SK, Comer SD, et al. (2013). Predictors of Marijuana Relapse in the Human Laboratory: Robust Impact of Tobacco Cigarette Smoking Status. Biological Psychiatry, 73(3), 242-248.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.07.028Cited in Section 1, Section 4, Section 5, Section 6, Section 10
- 3
Arnsten AFT (2009). Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(6), 410-422.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2648Cited in Section 1, Section 3
- 4
Schwabe L, Wolf OT (2009). Stress Prompts Habit Behavior in Humans. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(22), 7191-7198.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0979-09.2009Cited in Section 1, Section 3
- 5
Diamond A (2013). Executive Functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 135-168.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750Cited in Section 1, Section 9
- 6
Budney AJ, Moore BA, Vandrey RG, Hughes JR (2003). The time course and significance of cannabis withdrawal. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(3), 393-402.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.112.3.393Cited in Section 1, Section 4, Section 5, Section 10, Section 13, Section 14
- 7
Levin KH, Copersino ML, Heishman SJ, Liu F, Kelly DL, Boggs DL, et al. (2010). Cannabis withdrawal symptoms in non-treatment-seeking adult cannabis smokers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 111(1-2), 120-127.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.04.010Cited in Section 1, Section 2, Section 5, Section 10
- 8
Loewenstein G (2005). Hot-cold empathy gaps and medical decision making. Health Psychology, 24(4 Suppl), S49-S56.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S49Cited in Section 1, Section 10
- 9
Koob GF, Volkow ND (2016). Neurobiology of addiction: a neurocircuitry analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry, 3(8), 760-773.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)00104-8Cited in Section 1, Section 8
- 10
Caulkins JP (2024). Changes in self-reported cannabis use in the United States from 1979 to 2022. Addiction, 119(9), 1648-1652.
- 11
Chandra S, Radwan MM, Majumdar CG, Church JC, Freeman TP, ElSohly MA (2019). New trends in cannabis potency in USA and Europe during the last decade (2008-2017). European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 269(1), 5-15.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-019-00983-5Cited in Section 1, Section 3, Section 10, Section 14
- 12
Hasin DS, Saha TD, Kerridge BT, Goldstein RB, Chou SP, Zhang H, et al. (2015). Prevalence of Marijuana Use Disorders in the United States Between 2001-2002 and 2012-2013. JAMA Psychiatry, 72(12), 1235-1242.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.1858Cited in Section 2
- 13
Connor JP, Stjepanović D, Le Foll B, Hoch E, Budney AJ, Hall WD (2021). Cannabis use and cannabis use disorder. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 7(1), 16.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-021-00247-4Cited in Section 2, Section 12, Section 14
- 14
Lopez-Quintero C, de los Cobos JP, Hasin DS, Okuda M, Wang S, Grant BF, et al. (2011). Probability and predictors of transition from first use to dependence on nicotine, alcohol, cannabis, and cocaine: Results of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 115(1-2), 120-130.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.11.004Cited in Section 2
- 15
Freeman TP, Winstock AR (2015). Examining the profile of high-potency cannabis and its association with severity of cannabis dependence. Psychological Medicine, 45(15), 3181-3189.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291715001178Cited in Section 2, Section 3
- 16
Petrilli K, Ofori S, Hines L, Taylor G, Adams S, Freeman TP (2022). Association of cannabis potency with mental ill health and addiction: a systematic review. The Lancet Psychiatry, 9(9), 736-750.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00161-4Cited in Section 2, Section 3
- 17
Lopez-Quintero C, Hasin DS, de los Cobos JP, Pines A, Wang S, Grant BF, et al. (2011). Probability and predictors of remission from life-time nicotine, alcohol, cannabis or cocaine dependence: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Addiction, 106(3), 657-669.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03194.xCited in Section 2
- 18
Bonnet U, Preuss UW (2017). The cannabis withdrawal syndrome: current insights. Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation, 8, 9-37.
https://doi.org/10.2147/SAR.S109576Cited in Section 2, Section 5, Section 6, Section 8
- 19
Bahji A, Stephenson C, Tyo R, Hawken ER, Seitz DP (2020). Prevalence of Cannabis Withdrawal Symptoms Among People With Regular or Dependent Use of Cannabinoids. JAMA Network Open, 3(4), e202370.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2370Cited in Section 2, Section 5
- 20
Peters EN, Hughes JR (2010). Daily marijuana users with past alcohol problems increase alcohol consumption during marijuana abstinence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 106(2-3), 111-118.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.07.027Cited in Section 2, Section 10
- 21
Di Forti M, Quattrone D, Freeman TP, Tripoli G, Gayer-Anderson C, Quigley H, et al. (2019). The contribution of cannabis use to variation in the incidence of psychotic disorder across Europe (EU-GEI): a multicentre case-control study. The Lancet Psychiatry, 6(5), 427-436.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30048-3Cited in Section 2, Section 13
- 22
Marconi A, Di Forti M, Lewis CM, Murray RM, Vassos E (2016). Meta-analysis of the Association Between the Level of Cannabis Use and Risk of Psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 42(5), 1262-1269.
- 23
Starzer MSK, Nordentoft M, Hjorthøj C (2018). Rates and Predictors of Conversion to Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder Following Substance-Induced Psychosis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 175(4), 343-350.
https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17020223Cited in Section 2
- 24
Lev-Ran S, Roerecke M, Le Foll B, George TP, McKenzie K, Rehm J (2014). The association between cannabis use and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Medicine, 44(4), 797-810.
- 25
Sorensen CJ, DeSanto K, Borgelt L, Phillips KT, Monte AA (2017). Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome: Diagnosis, Pathophysiology, and Treatment: a Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Toxicology, 13(1), 71-87.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-016-0595-zCited in Section 2, Section 15
- 26
Nielsen S, Gowing L, Sabioni P, Le Foll B (2019). Pharmacotherapies for cannabis dependence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2019(1), CD008940.
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008940.pub3Cited in Section 2, Section 10, Section 15
- 27
Vandrey R, Smith MT, McCann UD, Budney AJ, Curran EM (2011). Sleep disturbance and the effects of extended-release zolpidem during cannabis withdrawal. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 117(1), 38-44.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.01.003Cited in Section 2, Section 6, Section 15
- 28
Gates PJ, Sabioni P, Copeland J, Le Foll B, Gowing L (2016). Psychosocial interventions for cannabis use disorder. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016(5), CD005336.
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005336.pub4Cited in Section 2, Section 14
- 29
Everitt BJ, Robbins TW (2016). Drug Addiction: Updating Actions to Habits to Compulsions Ten Years On. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 23-50.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033457Cited in Section 3
- 30
Morena M, Patel S, Bains JS, Hill MN (2016). Neurobiological Interactions Between Stress and the Endocannabinoid System. Neuropsychopharmacology, 41(1), 80-102.
- 31
Bossong MG, van Berckel BN, Boellaard R, Zuurman L, Schuit RC, Windhorst AD, et al. (2009). Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Induces Dopamine Release in the Human Striatum. Neuropsychopharmacology, 34(3), 759-766.
- 32
Schultz W, Dayan P, Montague PR (1997). A Neural Substrate of Prediction and Reward. Science, 275(5306), 1593-1599.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5306.1593Cited in Section 3
- 33
Berridge KC, Robinson TE (2016). Liking, wanting, and the incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. American Psychologist, 71(8), 670-679.
- 34
Hirvonen J, Goodwin RS, Li CT, Terry GE, Zoghbi SS, Morse C, et al. (2012). Reversible and regionally selective downregulation of brain cannabinoid CB1 receptors in chronic daily cannabis smokers. Molecular Psychiatry, 17(6), 642-649.
https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2011.82Cited in Section 3, Section 5, Section 8, Section 9, Section 10, Section 13, Section 14
- 35
D'Souza DC, Cortes-Briones JA, Ranganathan M, Thurnauer H, Creatura G, Surti T, et al. (2016). Rapid Changes in Cannabinoid 1 Receptor Availability in Cannabis-Dependent Male Subjects After Abstinence From Cannabis. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 1(1), 60-67.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2015.09.008Cited in Section 3, Section 5, Section 8, Section 10, Section 13, Section 14
- 36
Bloomfield MAP, Morgan CJA, Egerton A, Kapur S, Curran HV, Howes OD (2014). Dopaminergic Function in Cannabis Users and Its Relationship to Cannabis-Induced Psychotic Symptoms. Biological Psychiatry, 75(6), 470-478.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.05.027Cited in Section 3, Section 8
- 37
Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Telang F, Fowler JS, Alexoff D, Logan J, et al. (2014). Decreased dopamine brain reactivity in marijuana abusers is associated with negative emotionality and addiction severity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(30), E3149-E3156.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1411228111Cited in Section 3, Section 8
- 38
Bloomfield MAP, Ashok AH, Volkow ND, Howes OD (2016). The effects of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol on the dopamine system. Nature, 539(7629), 369-377.
- 39
ElSohly MA, Mehmedic Z, Foster S, Gon C, Chandra S, Church JC (2016). Changes in Cannabis Potency Over the Last 2 Decades (1995-2014): Analysis of Current Data in the United States. Biological Psychiatry, 79(7), 613-619.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.01.004Cited in Section 3, Section 14
- 40
Freeman TP, Craft S, Wilson J, Stylianou S, ElSohly M, Di Forti M, et al. (2021). Changes in delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) concentrations in cannabis over time: systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction, 116(5), 1000-1010.
- 41
Wood W, Rünger D (2016). Psychology of Habit. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 289-314.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033417Cited in Section 3, Section 4, Section 13
- 42
Filbey FM, Schacht JP, Myers US, Chavez RS, Hutchison KE (2009). Marijuana craving in the brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(31), 13016-13021.
- 43
Norberg MM, Kavanagh DJ, Olivier J, Lyras S (2016). Craving cannabis: a meta-analysis of self-report and psychophysiological cue-reactivity studies. Addiction, 111(11), 1923-1934.
https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13472Cited in Section 3, Section 5
- 44
Bickel WK, Johnson MW, Koffarnus MN, MacKillop J, Murphy JG (2014). The Behavioral Economics of Substance Use Disorders: Reinforcement Pathologies and Their Repair. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10(1), 641-677.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153724Cited in Section 3, Section 13
- 45
Solinas M, Thiriet N, Chauvet C, Jaber M (2010). Prevention and treatment of drug addiction by environmental enrichment. Progress in Neurobiology, 92(4), 572-592.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.08.002Cited in Section 3
- 46
Bresin K, Mekawi Y (2019). Do marijuana use motives matter? Meta-analytic associations with marijuana use frequency and problems. Addictive Behaviors, 99, 106102.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106102Cited in Section 4, Section 13
- 47
McRae-Clark AL, Carter RE, Price KL, Baker NL, Thomas S, Saladin ME, et al. (2011). Stress- and cue-elicited craving and reactivity in marijuana-dependent individuals. Psychopharmacology, 218(1), 49-58.
- 48
Copersino ML, Boyd SJ, Tashkin DP, Huestis MA, Heishman SJ, Dermand JC, et al. (2006). Cannabis Withdrawal Among Non-Treatment-Seeking Adult Cannabis Users. The American Journal on Addictions, 15(1), 8-14.
- 49
Koob GF, Le Moal M (2001). Drug Addiction, Dysregulation of Reward, and Allostasis. Neuropsychopharmacology, 24(2), 97-129.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-133X(00)00195-0Cited in Section 4
- 50
Legleye S, Karila L, Beck F, Reynaud M (2007). Validation of the CAST, a general population Cannabis Abuse Screening Test. Journal of Substance Use, 12(4), 233-242.
- 51
Babson KA, Sottile J, Morabito D (2017). Cannabis, Cannabinoids, and Sleep: a Review of the Literature. Current Psychiatry Reports, 19(4), 23.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-017-0775-9Cited in Section 4, Section 6
- 52
Agrawal A, Budney AJ, Lynskey MT (2012). The co-occurring use and misuse of cannabis and tobacco: a review. Addiction, 107(7), 1221-1233.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03837.xCited in Section 4, Section 10, Section 11, Section 13
- 53
Vandrey RG, Budney AJ, Hughes JR, Liguori A (2008). A within-subject comparison of withdrawal symptoms during abstinence from cannabis, tobacco, and both substances. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 92(1-3), 48-54.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.06.010Cited in Section 4, Section 10
- 54
LeGates TA, Fernandez DC, Hattar S (2014). Light as a central modulator of circadian rhythms, sleep and affect. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(7), 443-454.
- 55
Hasler BP, Smith LJ, Cousins JC, Bootzin RR (2012). Circadian rhythms, sleep, and substance abuse. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 16(1), 67-81.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2011.03.004Cited in Section 4, Section 6
- 56
Kouri EM, Pope HG (2000). Abstinence symptoms during withdrawal from chronic marijuana use. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 8(4), 483-492.
- 57
Budney AJ, Hughes JR, Moore BA, Vandrey R (2004). Review of the Validity and Significance of Cannabis Withdrawal Syndrome. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161(11), 1967-1977.
https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.161.11.1967Cited in Section 5, Section 13
- 58
Hasin DS, Keyes KM, Alderson D, Wang S, Aharonovich E, Grant BF (2008). Cannabis Withdrawal in the United States. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 69(9), 1354-1363.
- 59
Bolla KI, Lesage SR, Gamaldo CE, Neubauer DN, Wang NY, Funderburk FR, et al. (2010). Polysomnogram changes in marijuana users who report sleep disturbances during prior abstinence. Sleep Medicine, 11(9), 882-889.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2010.02.013Cited in Section 5, Section 6, Section 13, Section 14
- 60
Allsop DJ, Copeland J, Norberg MM, Fu S, Molnar A, Lewis J, et al. (2012). Quantifying the Clinical Significance of Cannabis Withdrawal. PLoS ONE, 7(9), e44864.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044864Cited in Section 5
- 61
Buchowski MS, Meade NN, Charboneau E, Park S, Dietrich MS, Cowan RL, et al. (2011). Aerobic Exercise Training Reduces Cannabis Craving and Use in Non-Treatment Seeking Cannabis-Dependent Adults. PLoS ONE, 6(3), e17465.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017465Cited in Section 5, Section 13, Section 14
- 62
Lynch WJ, Peterson AB, Sanchez V, Abel J, Smith MA (2013). Exercise as a novel treatment for drug addiction: A neurobiological and stage-dependent hypothesis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(8), 1622-1644.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.06.011Cited in Section 5
- 63
Ma X, Yue ZQ, Gong ZQ, Zhang H, Duan NY, Shi YT, et al. (2017). The Effect of Diaphragmatic Breathing on Attention, Negative Affect and Stress in Healthy Adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 874.
- 64
Lieberman MD, Eisenberger NI, Crockett MJ, Tom SM, Pfeifer JH, Way BM (2007). Putting feelings into words: affect labeling disrupts amygdala activity in response to affective stimuli. Psychological Science, 18(5), 421-428.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01916.xCited in Section 5
- 65
Gates P, Albertella L, Copeland J (2016). Cannabis Withdrawal and Sleep: A Systematic Review of Human Studies. Substance Abuse, 37(1), 255-269.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2015.1023484Cited in Section 6, Section 14
- 66
Feinberg I, Jones R, Walker J, Cavness C, Floyd T (1976). Effects of marijuana extract and tetrahydrocannabinol on electroencephalographic sleep patterns. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 19(6), 782-794.
- 67
Babson KA, Boden MT, Harris AH, Stickle TR, Bonn-Miller MO (2013). Poor sleep quality as a risk factor for lapse following a cannabis quit attempt. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 44(4), 438-443.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2012.08.224Cited in Section 6, Section 13
- 68
Yoo SS, Gujar N, Hu P, Jolesz FA, Walker MP (2007). The human emotional brain without sleep: a prefrontal amygdala disconnect. Current Biology, 17(20), R877-R878.
- 69
Volkow ND, Tomasi D, Wang GJ, Telang F, Fowler JS, Logan J, et al. (2012). Evidence That Sleep Deprivation Downregulates Dopamine D2R in Ventral Striatum in the Human Brain. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(19), 6711-6717.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0045-12.2012Cited in Section 6
- 70
Bergamaschi MM, Karschner EL, Goodwin RS, Scheidweiler KB, Hirvonen J, Queiroz RH, et al. (2013). Impact of Prolonged Cannabinoid Excretion in Chronic Daily Cannabis Smokers' Blood on Per Se Drugged Driving Laws. Clinical Chemistry, 59(3), 519-526.
https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2012.195503Cited in Section 7
- 71
Ellis GM, Mann MA, Judson BA, Schramm NT, Tashchian A (1985). Excretion patterns of cannabinoid metabolites after last use in a group of chronic users. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 38(5), 572-578.
- 72
Huestis MA (2007). Human Cannabinoid Pharmacokinetics. Chemistry & Biodiversity, 4(8), 1770-1804.
- 73
Gunasekaran N, Long L, Dawson B, Hansen G, Richardson D, Li K, et al. (2009). Reintoxication: the release of fat-stored Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) into blood is enhanced by food deprivation or ACTH exposure. British Journal of Pharmacology, 158(5), 1330-1337.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00399.xCited in Section 7
- 74
Wong A, Montebello ME, Norberg MM, Rooney K, Lintzeris N, Bruno R, et al. (2013). Exercise increases plasma THC concentrations in regular cannabis users. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 133(2), 763-767.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.07.031Cited in Section 7
- 75
Bouton ME (2002). Context, ambiguity, and unlearning: sources of relapse after behavioral extinction. Biological Psychiatry, 52(10), 976-986.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01546-9Cited in Section 8, Section 10, Section 11, Section 13
- 76
Scott JC, Slomiak ST, Jones JD, Rosen AFG, Moore TM, Gur RC (2018). Association of Cannabis With Cognitive Functioning in Adolescents and Young Adults. JAMA Psychiatry, 75(6), 585-595.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0335Cited in Section 9, Section 14
- 77
Schreiner AM, Dunn ME (2012). Residual effects of cannabis use on neurocognitive performance after prolonged abstinence: A meta-analysis. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 20(5), 420-429.
- 78
Pope HG, Gruber AJ, Hudson JI, Huestis MA, Yurgelun-Todd D (2001). Neuropsychological Performance in Long-term Cannabis Users. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58(10), 909-915.
https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.58.10.909Cited in Section 9
- 79
Schuster RM, Gilman J, Schoenfeld D, Evenden J, Hareli M, Ulysse C, et al. (2018). One Month of Cannabis Abstinence in Adolescents and Young Adults Is Associated With Improved Memory. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 79(6), 17m11977.
- 80
Meier MH, Caspi A, Ambler A, Harrington H, Houts R, Keefe RSE, et al. (2012). Persistent cannabis users show neuropsychological decline from childhood to midlife. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(40), E2657-E2664.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1206820109Cited in Section 9, Section 14
- 81
Lawn W, Freeman TP, Pope RA, Joye A, Harvey L, Hindocha C, et al. (2016). Acute and chronic effects of cannabinoids on effort-related decision-making and reward learning: an evaluation of the cannabis ‘amotivational’ hypotheses. Psychopharmacology, 233(19-20), 3537-3552.
- 82
Skumlien M, Mokrysz C, Freeman TP, Valton V, Wall MB, Bloomfield M, et al. (2023). Anhedonia, Apathy, Pleasure, and Effort-Based Decision-Making in Adult and Adolescent Cannabis Users and Controls. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 26(1), 9-19.
- 83
Volkow ND, Swanson JM, Evins AE, DeLisi LE, Meier MH, Gonzalez R, et al. (2016). Effects of Cannabis Use on Human Behavior, Including Cognition, Motivation, and Psychosis: A Review. JAMA Psychiatry, 73(3), 292-297.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.3278Cited in Section 9
- 84
Lozano BE, Stephens RS, Roffman RA (2006). Abstinence and moderate use goals in the treatment of marijuana dependence. Addiction, 101(11), 1589-1597.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01609.xCited in Section 10
- 85
Wegner DM, Schneider DJ, Carter SR, White TL (1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(1), 5-13.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.5Cited in Section 10, Section 13
- 86
Hayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, Masuda A, Lillis J (2006). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(1), 1-25.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006Cited in Section 10
- 87
Christakis NA, Fowler JH (2008). The Collective Dynamics of Smoking in a Large Social Network. New England Journal of Medicine, 358(21), 2249-2258.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0706154Cited in Section 11, Section 13
- 88
Litt MD, Kadden RM, Kabela-Cormier E, Petry N (2007). Changing network support for drinking: Initial findings from the Network Support Project. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(4), 542-555.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.75.4.542Cited in Section 11
- 89
Duckworth AL, Gendler TS, Gross JJ (2016). Situational Strategies for Self-Control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(1), 35-55.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615623247Cited in Section 11, Section 13
- 90
Oyserman D, Fryberg SA, Yoder N (2007). Identity-based motivation and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(6), 1011-1027.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1011Cited in Section 11, Section 13
- 91
Best D, Beckwith M, Haslam C, Haslam SA, Jetten J, Mawson E, et al. (2016). Overcoming alcohol and other drug addiction as a process of social identity transition: the social identity model of recovery (SIMOR). Addiction Research & Theory, 24(2), 111-123.
https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2015.1075980Cited in Section 11
- 92
Driskell JE, Copper C, Moran A (1994). Does mental practice enhance performance?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 481-492.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.481Cited in Section 11, Section 13
- 93
Gollwitzer PM, Sheeran P (2006). Implementation Intentions and Goal Achievement: A Meta-analysis of Effects and Processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69-119.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1Cited in Section 11, Section 13
- 94
Kirshenbaum AP, Olsen DM, Bickel WK (2009). A quantitative review of the ubiquitous relapse curve. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 36(1), 8-17.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2008.04.001Cited in Section 12
- 95
Curry S, Marlatt GA, Gordon JR (1987). Abstinence violation effect: Validation of an attributional construct with smoking cessation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(2), 145-149.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.55.2.145Cited in Section 12, Section 13, Section 14
- 96
Witkiewitz K, Marlatt GA (2004). Relapse Prevention for Alcohol and Drug Problems: That Was Zen, This Is Tao. American Psychologist, 59(4), 224-235.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.4.224Cited in Section 12
- 97
Kavanagh DJ, Andrade J, May J (2005). Imaginary Relish and Exquisite Torture: The Elaborated Intrusion Theory of Desire. Psychological Review, 112(2), 446-467.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.2.446Cited in Section 12
- 98
Bowen S, Marlatt A (2009). Surfing the urge: Brief mindfulness-based intervention for college student smokers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23(4), 666-671.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017127Cited in Section 12, Section 13, Section 14
- 99
Kwako LE, Momenan R, Litten RZ, Koob GF, Goldman D (2016). Addictions Neuroclinical Assessment: A Neuroscience-Based Framework for Addictive Disorders. Biological Psychiatry, 80(3), 179-189.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.10.024Cited in Section 13
- 100
Dai H, Milkman KL, Riis J (2014). The Fresh Start Effect: Temporal Landmarks Motivate Aspirational Behavior. Management Science, 60(10), 2563-2582.
- 101
Bandura A (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191Cited in Section 13
- 102
Harkin B, Webb TL, Chang BPI, Prestwich A, Conner M, Kellar I, et al. (2016). Does monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 142(2), 198-229.
- 103
Lally P, van Jaarsveld CHM, Potts HWW, Wardle J (2010). How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(6), 998-1009.
- 104
Budney AJ, Moore BA, Rocha HL, Higgins ST (2006). Clinical trial of abstinence-based vouchers and cognitive-behavioral therapy for cannabis dependence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(2), 307-316.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.74.2.307Cited in Section 14